Quantum Superluminal Communication

Quantum collapse alone can't provide the means of realizing QSC, and its inherent randomicity ruthlessly block the way. Here consciousness becomes a delicate bridge to QSC. The direct intervention of consciousness can help to obtain more information about the measured quantum state, which is enough to distinguish nonorthogonal states, and decode the veiled information nonlocally transferred by collapse. This provides a possible way to realize QSC.
— Foundations of Physics Letters, 17(2), (2004) 177

The existence of QSC may be a natural result of the combination of quantum and consciousness, or a natural result of the complete theory of nature.
— Foundations of Physics Letters, 17(2), (2004) 175

A Brief Argument

[Premise]
There exist indefinite quantum superpositions and definite conscious perceptions.

[Argument]
The conscious system in a definite conscious state has conscious perception.
The conscious system in a quantum superposition has no conscious perception*;
The conscious system can be conscious of the transition from the quantum superposition of definite conscious perceptions to one of the definite conscious perceptions;

[Conclusion]
The conscious system can distinguish nonorthogonal states. This will directly lead to the the availability of QSC.

[*] For a detailed and complete argument see the new book Quantum Motion and relevant papers.

A Popular Introduction

It is a plain fact that special relativity prohibits the existence of superluminal signalling or superluminal communication. Their combination will result in the famous causal loop, which is forbidden in logic. On the other hand, if there exists an absolute frame or a preferred Lorentz frame, the existence of superluminal communication may no longer result in the forbidden causal loop. But this is evidently inconsistent with the principle of relativity. However, although the principle of relativity has been confirmed in the classical domain, its role in the quantum domain is still unclear, and controversy still exists. Read More »

Relating Ideas

My recollection (2003, in Chinese)